Showing posts with label News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Historic Trio Gears Up For A Big Ride At Mille Miglia



The Mille Miglia 2014 starts today, May 15, in the north Italian city of Brescia and will cover more than 1,600 kilometers (1,000 miles) on a route that includes Padua, San Marino, Rome, Siena, Pisa and Bologna before returning to the start point.

60 years on from its Mille Miglia debut, a BMW Isetta is once again lining up at today’s start of the legendary endurance tour through northern Italy. The diminutive two-seater with green paintwork is competing in this year’s Mille Miglia as part of the BMW Group Classic squad, which also includes two BMW 507 models along with four BMW 328 historic racers. BMW Group Classic is thus deploying all the models that were at the start of the historic race events held from 1927 to 1957, which automatically qualifies them to take part in the revived version for historic cars launched in 1977.

In May 1954 a total of seven Iso Isetta models took part in the Mille Miglia. They were the predecessors of the “Motocoupé” built under licence by BMW from 1955 to 1962. With no prospect of beating their high-performance rivals but displaying remarkable stamina, these “smoochballs” quickly won over the hearts of the spectators. The following year saw four Iso Isettas line up for the race, which already started and finished in Brescia back then.

The BMW 507 made its sole appearance in 1957, the last Mille Miglia to be staged as a race event. In 1992 it rode to victory in the revived event for historic cars. But the most enduring and spectacular success story belongs to the BMW 328. In 1938 this extremely lightweight and reliable sports car drew attention to itself by capturing a class victory at its debut appearance in the Mille Miglia. Two years on an even greater triumph lay in store – overall victory for Fritz Huschke von Hanstein and Walter Bäumer in the BMW 328 Mille Miglia Touring Coupé.

The winning car of 1940 will also be at the start of this year’s Mille Miglia. The Coupé with its tubular space frame and “superleggera” body has been one of the showpieces of the BMW Group Classic collection since 2002. It landed a very special coup in 2004 when Giuliano Cané and his wife Lucia Galliani as co-driver took the car across the finish line in Brescia to a second victory, making the BMW 328 Mille Miglia Touring Coupé the first car ever to win not only the classic race event but also the new version of the Mille Miglia for historic automobiles. Besides this winning model, the BMW Group Classic fleet lining up this year also includes the BMW 328 Touring Roadster as well as a 1938 BMW 328 which finished third in 1940 – the BMW 328 Mille Miglia Roadster.

A total of 430 historic vehicles have registered for the 2014 Mille Miglia. This year, for the first time, the round trip will be carried out over four days rather than three. Launching from the traditional starting point at 6pm today, May 15, the cars will initially head towards Padua. The second and longest stage finishes in Rome on Friday evening, while the following day the route leads to Siena and then along a new section via Volterra, Lucca and Pisa to Bologna. From there, on Sunday, May 18, competitors will tackle the final stretch towards Brescia where the first cars are expected to heave into view around midday.




Saturday, May 18, 2013

Abercrombie and Fitch: Are Jeffries marketing tactics bad?


You’ve most likely read or heard something about the 2006 interview that Abercrombie & Fitch CEO, Mike Jeffries, gave to journalist, Benoit Denizet-Lewis. Within that article, for Salon.com, Jeffries off-the-wall personality really came to light. With bizarre musings about what an “A&F guy” should be to the blatant dislike for those that Jeffries deems “unattractive,” albeit in poor taste, are Jeffries marketing tactics bad?

The answer to this question is no. The 68-year-old creeper-like millioare is marketing Abercrombie and Fitch in precisely the way the company should be marketed, in line with Jeffries customer base and bottom objective. To better explain the madness behind the marketing are some words from Bruce Clark, Associate Professor and Group Coordinator, and Frank Murphy, Family Fellow at the D'Amore-McKim School of Business at Northeastern University.

Professor Clark shares these thoughts about the Abercrombie and Fitch firestorm. “Regarding its own customers, A&F is doing what any good firm should do: pick a target market and serve it well. They don’t carry large size women’s clothes. They also don’t carry toddler clothes, clothes for elderly people, pet food, or bicycles. A&F serves a certain population with a specific offering. Cultivating a brand image through a clear value proposition to a defined target market is good marketing.”

Taken purely from a marketing prospective, Mike Jeffries is doing exactly what he’s supposed to be doing. Of course there is a whole other element to what Jeffries is doing. Professor Clark explains, “I see the marketing problem as how A&F is treating people who aren’t its customers. Your mother’s rule is right here: ‘if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything.’ You don’t see the chairman of BMW saying, ‘Poor people aren’t worth our time.’ Talking about cool kids and being exclusionary of the uncool is stupid and, on the Internet, stupid is forever.” Clark adds, “It’s especially stupid when you’re dealing with a topic as sensitive as teenagers and weight.”


Benjamin O'Keefe of Orlando, Florida has started a petition on Change.org requesting that Mike Jeffries “Stop telling teens they aren't beautiful and make clothes for teens of all sizes.” While O’Keefe’s heart is in the right place, asking A&F for an apology or to make clothes for all sizes isn’t going to happen. Nor is Hollister, A&F’s stores for the “high school” crowd, going to change. Since this writer has been in both A&F and Hollister, I have first-hand experience of the feel of these two stores. And with that experience, I wouldn’t wear either label if they were given to me. Perhaps a better avenue to go is to do as Greg Karber has done; give all of your A&F clothing to the homeless and then proceed to shop elsewhere.


Tuesday, September 25, 2012

DPW Secretary Gary D. Alexander’s letter to the General Assembly

Dear Members of General Assembly:

I am writing to provide you with an update on the department's efforts to implement co-payments for families making over 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) in the category of Medical Assistance (MA) often referred to as the "loophole" category, which covers eligible children with mental and physical disabilities.  First and foremost, it is important to note that we take our role in protecting Pennsylvania's children very seriously. While many opponents have sensationalized this initiative, here are the key facts:
  • There will be no changes to services or health care benefits as a result of this initiative. Services provided to children with disabilities will not change.  The department will continue to cover health care needs for these children now and well into the future.
  • Care for children receiving services through this category is costly.  Today, nearly 48,000 children receive Medicaid services under this category, costing taxpayers approximately $700 million a year.
  • Many of the families who receive these services have the ability to pay their fair share.  About 80 percent of these families have incomes above 200 percent of the federal poverty level and 1 in 4 have incomes above $100,000 a year.
  • All in-school services provided by schools are exempt from the co-payment requirement.
  • No other state has eligibility criteria as generous as Pennsylvania's. Pennsylvania is the only state that allows a child whose disability does not require institutional care to be eligible for Medicaid without considering the parent's income, child support or Social Security benefits received by the child.
  • We must act now to protect the safety net.  Targeting co-payments based on ability to pay will allow us to continue to effectively serve the most vulnerable Pennsylvanians who need it most.
Background
Under federal law, states have the option in their Medicaid program to cover children with physical and mental disabilities, without regard to their family's income, if the child needs an institutional level of care but can receive that care at home. This option was authorized by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) (Pub. L. No. 97-248). Twenty states have elected the TEFRA option, commonly referred to as a Katie Beckett Waiver.

Currently, Pennsylvania is the only state that allows a child whose disability does not require institutional care to be eligible for Medicaid without considering the parent's income, child support or Social Security benefits received by the child. This is why it's been referred to as the "loophole" category.  Pennsylvania started covering these children in November 1988, and the number has grown significantly through the years.  Today, nearly 48,000 children receive Medicaid services through this category resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars at the expense of the taxpayer each year. Unlike other families served by the department, these families have the means to afford the co-payments for the services they receive.  About 80 percent of these families have incomes above 200 percent of the FPL, and one in four has an income above $100,000 a year.

Co-payments
Through this initiative, we are asking those families with incomes above the normal Medicaid eligibility levels to contribute to the cost of services for their children.  The department currently applies co-payments to other individuals with income levels substantially below 200 percent FPL.  Targeting co-payments based on ability to pay will ultimately protect the safety net and allow us to continue to effectively serve Pennsylvanians now and well into the future.

There has been some discussion regarding the department's decision to implement co-payments instead of a premium, both of which have been approved by the General Assembly and are currently authorized in the Public Welfare Code.  Unfortunately, as with many issues facing our department, our actions are limited by Maintenance of Effort (MOE) provisions in the president's health care law: the Affordable Care Act.  The department received early guidance from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) that a premium would likely violate the MOE requirements. We will continue to explore a premium as an option. However, we need to move forward with implementing co-payments to establish cost sharing.

In addition to the authority in Act 22 of 2011 to establish co-payments for families with incomes above 200 percent FPL, the federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) gave states the option to apply cost sharing to non-exempt populations based on family income, including disabled children who are traditionally exempt from cost sharing.  While the DRA allows for flexibility in how income is counted, it caps the maximum aggregate cost sharing at five percent of total family income.

The following points are intended to provide an update and further information regarding the department's co-payment policy.
  • A public notice was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on Aug. 11, 2012 to announce the department's intent to amend our state plan to apply co-payments to children with disabilities, and the department will issue a Medical Assistance bulletin to providers before Oct. 1.
  • The department will implement the co-payments in the fee-for-service delivery system on Oct. 1 for newly eligible recipients, and Nov. 1 for those currently eligible. The difference in dates is due to recipient notification requirements.  These notices have recently been mailed to impacted families.
  • As indicated in the public notice, most co-payments will be on a sliding scale with a specified co-payment amount for each range, or tier, based on the MA fee for the service, not to exceed 20 percent of the lowest fee on each tier (i.e., the higher the cost of the service, the higher the co-payment).  Co-payments for inpatient hospital stays, prescription drugs, diagnostic services, and psychotherapy will be set at fixed amounts, not on a sliding scale.
  • Upgrades to the department's eligibility and claims processing systems, in order to support the new co-payments, are complete and ready to be put into operation.
  • DPW has established a tracking system to ensure each family's total co-payments will be capped to not exceed five percent of the family's aggregate annual income, prorated and applied on a monthly basis, as determined by the county assistance offices. Not all families will hit the cap, however, as it is dependent on the family's utilization of services. The family's co-payment liability will be portioned across the fee-for-service, physical health managed care and behavioral health managed care delivery systems based on the utilization analysis completed by the department.
  • Services exempt from the co-payment requirement include all the services currently excluded for adult MA recipients, as identified in MA program regulations.  Further, preventive services, MA services provided through the School Based ACCESS Program, Early Intervention and Home and Community-Based Program waivers will also not require a co-payment.
  • Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) may implement the co-payments, but are not mandated to do so. MCOs that choose to implement the co-payments will need to determine and develop the process for how co-payments will be assessed and collected.  The department will inform them of their respective portions of the maximum monthly co-payment liability amount.  They will then be required to notify members and network providers of their intent to apply co-payments and of their liability amount, track co-payments applied within their respective systems, and shut off the co-payments if a family reaches the MCO's portion of the maximum co-payment liability amount. MCOs may also apply the co-payments in a less restrictive manner (i.e., a lesser co-payment amount for the same service(s) applied by the department).

In addition to the information provided in this letter, we have included a document of frequently asked questions to assist you and your constituents in understanding this change.

Sincerely,
Gary D. Alexander, Secretary
Department of Public Welfare

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

U.S. Department of Justice - Voter ID Law Letter

DOJ-Letter-on-Pennsylvania-Voter-ID-Law_072312


The link above is the July 23 letter from Assistant Attorney General Perez to Pennsylvania's Secretary of State, Carol Aichele. 

Monday, July 23, 2012

RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 045-2012


FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received ground beef products that have been recalled by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. This list may not include all retail locations that have received the recalled product or may include retail locations that did not actually receive the recalled product. Therefore, it is important that you use the product-specific identification information:

The products subject to recall, sold wholesale and for further processing:

14-pound chub packages of "Ground Beef Fine 85/15", packed 3 chubs to approximate 42-pound cases. The products subject to recall bears the establishment number "EST. 9400" inside the USDA mark of inspection.

Retail List for Recall Number: 045-2012; Ground Beef Products

List Current As Of: 22-Jul-12

Retailer Name Location:  Hannaford

Nationwide, State-Wide, or Area-Wide Distribution
Stores in MA, ME, NH, NY and VT


Recall Release:    CLASS I RECALL
FSIS-RC-045-2012:   HEALTH RISK: HIGH